On Wed., July 27, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform is holding a listening to with the CEOs of firearm producers Daniel Protection, Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co. on the subject of gun violence in America, with a particular deal with the gross sales and advertising and marketing of assault rifles.
The listening to comes amid the resurging debate over restrictions on weapons following the mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas, and Buffalo, New York, and most not too long ago, in Highland Park, Illinois.
Whereas the controversy normally tends to deal with firearm manufacturing, distribution and consumerism as avenues for intervention, it looks as if a few of that focus could also be going to advertising and marketing now.
Though there is no such thing as a federal regulation on how weapons are marketed, many high media corporations have strict insurance policies in opposition to adverts that promote or promote weapons. But firearm corporations and influencers are in a position to submit some content material throughout social media.
Advocates for stricter firearm legal guidelines imagine limiting the advertising and marketing of assault weapons might translate to fewer gun-related deaths. Ought to the U.S. take a much bigger stance on regulating them?
Watch the video to seek out out extra.